Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For safe distance from 5g tower , a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.